Judge Blocks Trump-Era Law Cutting Medicaid Funding to Planned Parenthood

Date:

A federal judge appointed by President Obama has temporarily blocked a provision of a new law signed by former President Donald Trump that sought to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood and similar organizations.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a nationwide preliminary injunction on Monday, halting enforcement of a section in the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The law, which includes a one-year ban on Medicaid funding for nonprofits that provide abortion services, was set to impact Planned Parenthood, even though federal law already prohibits direct funding of abortions under the Hyde Amendment.

Judge Talwani argued that the provision may be unconstitutional, stating it likely violates the First Amendment by retaliating against Planned Parenthood for its advocacy and association with abortion services, despite providing other non-abortion health care services like contraception and STI testing.

“Restricting Members’ ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs,” Talwani wrote in her 58-page opinion.

Although Planned Parenthood was not explicitly named in the legislation, the organization presented evidence suggesting it was specifically targeted, citing public statements from Republican lawmakers.

Last week, Judge Talwani had already blocked enforcement of the law against 10 Planned Parenthood clinics that do not perform abortions. Her latest ruling expands that protection to all Planned Parenthood locations nationwide.

She clarified that the injunction does not require the federal government to fund abortion or any service not covered by Medicaid, nor does it require spending beyond what is already appropriated.

Medicaid serves approximately 70 million low-income Americans. For decades, providers like Planned Parenthood have received reimbursement for non-abortion services, despite performing abortions at some locations.

The case is ongoing, and the preliminary injunction will remain in effect while the constitutional challenge is resolved in court.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

4th USBCCI Business Expo & Global SME Fair 2025 Successfully Concludes in New York

Held on November 21–22 at the DoubleTree by Hilton,...

Aviation Groups Warn Government Shutdown Threatens Aircraft Safety and Air Traffic Control Systems

More than 50 aviation trade groups are sounding the...

White House Launches ‘TrumpRx’ as Pfizer Slashes Drug Prices Up to 85%

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a sweeping move aimed at...

NTV Europe CEO Sabrina Hossain Honored by New York State Senate and Assembly

New York, USA – Sabrina Hossain, the CEO of...